Monday, August 29, 2011

Wildfire Risk Analysis


Data:
Specific data was necessary to fully analyze wildfire risk analysis within the Los Angeles Mountains. I first acquired a digital elevation map from the USGS seamless server. This DEM included all of Los Angeles County. Next I utilized a free data portal within the California Forestry and Fire Protection services website to obtain a raster image and data table of vegetation within LA county. Finally, a simple station fire parameter shapefile was needed to specify location and overall area of interest. By reclassifying and combining my two, raster models I compromised a working risk analysis map of the area around the 2009 station fires.
Analysis:
            The first step in my analysis was obtaining and reclassifying terrain slope in respect to fire risk. To do this, I modified my slope map to contain only 5 categories of value ranging from 1-10. Low sloping areas received a low value (less likely to assist wildfire) while increasingly steep slopes received higher values. Overall, fire burns in an upward direction, steep slopes allow wildfires to spread much quicker creating a larger hazard. My next step was vegetation analysis. My approach was very similar to terrain slope. I utilized the reclassification tool to rank vegetation types according to their burning characteristics. To effectively achieve this, I used “WHR10NAME” category within the attribute table. This category specifies overall vegetation type, not just specific species. In my reclassification, shrub or chaparral contains the highest burn index and received a value of 10. Wetland, agriculture, desert and barren areas received low values. Overall this reclassification provided a ramping scale from 1-10 representing the fuel capacity of vegetation subtypes. At this point, my final analysis required me to combine these two reclassifications. Both slope reclass and vege reclass were in raster form. This allowed me to simply sum up new fuel indexes within the raster calculator. The output was a scale ranging from 2-20. The higher the value, the more likely the area will burn out of control. Within my calculations, I chose to weight vegetation and slope exactly the same. The final touch was activating the station fire parameters and utilizing this boundary as a reference location. It is very evident that this area contains very high fire hazard.
           

Monday, August 15, 2011

Quiz 1

Medical marijuana dispensaries have a prominent presence in Los Angeles. The LA city council is now setting a communal regulation on these businesses by   enforcing a 1000 foot barrier of separation between any dispensary in the city of Los Angeles and any “child-friendly” location. Specifically, this includes parks, schools, and public libraries within the city. It is important to also consider and respect the rights of those that utilize medicinal marijuana for pain management, daily wellness, and overall increased standard of living. By analyzing the current distribution of cannabis dispensaries and the location of schools, libraries, and parks, I have determined that this ordinance can be implemented without eradicating “holistic medicine”.
To begin my analysis, I chose to visually display the specific street addresses of 42 cannabis dispensaries within the city of Los Angeles. This allows me to not only view the relative distribution, but perform the appropriate analysis required to make an educated decision. By placing 1000 foot buffers around every dispensary and uploading spatial data for schools, parks, and libraries, I can identify the exact businesses that would be in violation of the new city ordinance. Of the original 42 locations, only 5 dispensaries breach the 1000 foot “barrier rule”. Although implementation of the new ordinance would close these 5 locations, the majority would remain valid and legal.
Does it make sense to implement this “barrier rule” in the city of Los Angeles? With the new ordinance, families can afford to be less concerned about the placement of dispensaries, enforcement would be cheap and easy, and medical marijuana patients would still have more than enough options. Economically speaking, medical marijuana within Los Angeles is a taxable good. Cannabis clubs are therefore a valid contributor to the strength of Southern California’s economy and GDP. Because of this, it is important to respect these establishments as professional businesses. The City’s ordinance is therefore beneficial because it wouldn’t eradicate this entire sector. Ideally the community will respect these retailers even more because they are abiding by “family friendly” law.
Allow I firmly believe that implementing the medical marijuana ordinance is a positive decision and a step forward, it is still important to consider the drawbacks of this choice. Business will be shut down meaning individuals will lose jobs. Although enforcement will be fairly cheap, it requires a special police force unit to ensure that proper action is being followed. Most importantly, any major controversial decision atomically generates a societal dichotomy. Overall, I feel these drawbacks are outweighed by the benefits of the city ordinance and “buffer rule”.

References:
UCLA Map Share
Enterprise GIS
California NORML: Medical Marijuana Collective Index

Geocoding Time



Jaryd Block
703660706
8-15-11
Geocoding: Applied to Communal Agriculture
The greater metropolis of Los Angeles can be a difficult location to partake in personal gardening.  Due to steep real estate prices, obtaining enough land to farm fresh produce requires a notable amount of capital. Because of this I choose to explore the spatial distribution of community gardens within this county. These individual sites are completely maintained, farmed, and managed by the public. More importantly, individuals from just about any income background can easily participate.
By compiling and tabulating address data, geocoding allows me to easily transform an excel spreadsheet into visual information. By spatially plotting over 50 different community garden locations, relative distribution is easily established. My map also contains my current address so I can easily determine the most accessible gardens. Astonishingly, many of these communal sites are located within low-income neighborhoods providing a constructive space for rough communities. As a newer member of the LA area, a visual display of address data is much more useful than the simple tabulated format. Geocoding extended my personal knowledge of community garden locations within the county.

NAME ADDRESS ZIP TYPE
Tarzana Community 18702 Erwin St 91335 Community Garden
New City Farms 225 E 15th St 90813 Community Garden
Monterey Eco 870 Monterey Rd 91206 Community Garden
Wrigley Village 2044 Pacific Ave 90806 Community Garden
Raymond Ave 2632 Raymond Ave 90007 Community Garden
Arleta 8800 Canterbury Ave 91331 Community Garden
Bougainvillia E 103rd St & Grape St 90002 Community Garden
Bell Gardens 7800 Scout Ave 90201 Community Garden
Baldwin Park 13067 Bess Ave 91706 Community Garden
Central Hollywood 1259 N Mansfield Ave 90038 Community Garden
Columbia Park 4045 W 190th St 90504 Community Garden
Crenshaw 1423 Crenshaw Blvd 90019 Community Garden
Culver City 10860 Culver Blvd 90230 Community Garden
Dan McKenzie 4324 160th St 90260 Community Garden
Eagle Rockdale 1003 Rockdale Ave 90041 Community Garden
El Sereno 5466 Huntington Dr N 90032 Community Garden
Enrique Noguera 6614 Fountain Ave 90038 Community Garden
Francis Ave 2909 Francis Ave 90005 Community Garden
Salad Bowl Garden 16003 Rinaldi St 91344 Community Garden
Greater Watts 600 E 118th Pl 90059 Community Garden
Howard Finn 7747 Foothill Blvd 91042 Community Garden
Hudson 2335 Webster Ave 90810 Community Garden
Jardin Del Rio 2363 Riverdale Ave 90031 Community Garden
Gibson's Community 1401 S Harbor Blvd 90731 Community Garden
Lakewood 5200 Carfax Ave 90713 Community Garden
La Mirada 13518 Biola Ave 90638 Community Garden
Loma Alta 3330 Lincoln Ave 91001 Community Garden
Long Beach 7600 E Spring St 90815 Community Garden
Manzanita St 1101 Manzanita St 90029 Community Garden
Mar Vista 5075 S Slauson Ave 90230 Community Garden
North Hollywood 11800 Weddington St 91607 Community Garden
North Long Beach 6895 N Myrtle Ave 90805 Community Garden
Norwalk 12739 Studebaker Rd 90650 Community Garden
Norwich 417 Norwich Dr 90048 Community Garden
Ocean View Farms 3300 S Centinela Ave 90066 Community Garden
Orcutt Ranch 23600 Roscoe Blvd 91304 Community Garden
Paramount 7200 Cortland Ave 90723 Community Garden
Parkman 20800 Burbank Blvd 91367 Community Garden
Pico Rivera 8606 Beverly Rd 90660 Community Garden
Pomona 1120 W Fremont St 91766 Community Garden
Proyecto Jardin 1718 Bridge St 90033 Community Garden
Rosecrans Farms 561 W 146th St 90248 Community Garden
Rosewood 4160 Rosewood Ave 90004 Community Garden
San Pedro 1400 S Gaffey St 90731 Community Garden
Santa Fe Springs 10145 Pioneer Blvd 90670 Community Garden
Santa Monica 2300 Main St 90405 Community Garden
Santa Monica 1400 Park Dr 90404 Community Garden
Santa Monica 1525 Euclid St 90404 Community Garden
Sepulveda Center 16633 Magnolia Blvd 91316 Community Garden
Solano Canyon 545 Solano Ave 90012 Community Garden
Stanford Avalon 658 E 111th Pl 90059 Community Garden
Summit Ave 1282 N Summit Ave 91103 Community Garden
Union Ave 1136 S Union Ave 90015 Community Garden
Urban Oasis Foods 5010 11th Ave 90043 Community Garden
Van Nuys 16400 Chase St 91343 Community Garden
Vermont Square 4712 S Vermont Ave 90037 Community Garden
Wattles Farm 1714 N Curson Ave 90046 Community Garden
Winston Smoyer 1006 Clay Ct 91801 Community Garden
Yamazaki Memorial 961 S Mariposa Ave 90006 Community Garden
Project Youth 12467 Osborne St 91331 Community Garden
Venice Community 643 Milfred Ave 90291 Community Garden


Note: this document contains 62 addresses